1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3280 mm |