1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 793 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
Model | 2000 | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1463 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |