1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno

To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 395 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.

Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Abarth 2000 2006 Suzuki Reno
Make Abarth Suzuki
Model 2000 Reno
Year Released 1964 2006
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1946 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 182 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 670 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 3620 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1220 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2610 mm