1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,202 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2008 Honda CR-V. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2008 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 1017 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Abarth | Honda |
Model | 2000 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2202 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 97.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 16.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2640 mm |