1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 900 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 2000 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |