1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | HHR |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2640 mm |