1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 2000 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 88.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2900 mm |
