1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 2000 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 2000 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 161 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
