1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2009 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2009 Renault Symbol. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Symbol weights approximately 330 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2009 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 2000 | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 64 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2473 mm |
