1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2010 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2010 Fiat Croma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Croma. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Croma weights approximately 835 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2010 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | 2000 | Croma |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |