1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2010 Porsche Cayenne
To start off, 2010 Porsche Cayenne is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Porsche Cayenne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Porsche Cayenne (290 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Porsche Cayenne should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Porsche Cayenne weights approximately 1490 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Porsche Cayenne is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Porsche Cayenne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2010 Porsche Cayenne | |
Make | Abarth | Porsche |
Model | 2000 | Cayenne |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4798 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1699 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2855 mm |