1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2011 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda CR-V.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 2000 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Abarth | Honda |
| Model | 2000 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2619 mm |
