1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2011 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2011 Toyota Sienna is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Sienna (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 2000 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2011 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Sienna |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3030 mm |