1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 6. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 814 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 2000 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1484 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1795 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2789 mm |
