1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 781 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | 2000 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2639 mm |
