1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 2000 | 3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2640 mm |