1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2013 Nissan ALTIMA
To start off, 2013 Nissan ALTIMA is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan ALTIMA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2013 Nissan ALTIMA. (180 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan ALTIMA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan ALTIMA weights approximately 749 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan ALTIMA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2013 Nissan ALTIMA | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 2000 | ALTIMA |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1419 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1829 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2776 mm |