1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Smart Fortwo weights approximately 170 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 2000 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 2000 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1867 mm |