1964 Abarth 595 vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 1964 Abarth 595 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 763 cc (2 cylinders), 1956 Saab 92B is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Saab 92B weights approximately 311 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 1956 Saab 92B | |
Make | Abarth | Saab |
Model | 595 | 92B |
Year Released | 1964 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2480 mm |