1964 Abarth 595 vs. 1963 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1964 Abarth 595 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 976 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 1963 Jaguar MK II | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 595 | MK II |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 2482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 90 L |
