1964 Abarth 595 vs. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (27 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth 595. (45 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth 595.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 595 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 593 cc | 4958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 101.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 76.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2750 mm |