1964 Abarth 595 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 466 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | 595 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 57 L |
