1964 Abarth 595 vs. 1972 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1972 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 5,752 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (330 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1012 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 1972 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 595 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 5752 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 330 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2780 mm |