1964 Abarth 595 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Ascona (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 446 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Abarth | Opel |
| Model | 595 | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |
