1964 Abarth 595 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Zo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Zo should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 1101 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 595 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 595 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 595 | Zo |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 83 L |