1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 815 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Abarth | Seat |
| Model | 595 | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2850 mm |
