1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 896 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Abarth | Tata |
Model | 595 | E |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2810 mm |