1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2002 Kia Rio
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Rio weights approximately 546 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2002 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Abarth | Kia |
| Model | 595 | Rio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2420 mm |
