1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2002 Lancia Lybra
To start off, 2002 Lancia Lybra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lancia Lybra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Lybra (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 816 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2002 Lancia Lybra | |
Make | Abarth | Lancia |
Model | 595 | Lybra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2600 mm |