1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2003 AC Aceca
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 1136 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2003 AC Aceca | |
| Make | Abarth | AC |
| Model | 595 | Aceca |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 3506 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 90 L |
