1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Caterham 7 weights approximately 26 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Abarth | Caterham |
Model | 595 | 7 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2230 mm |