1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 695 cc (2 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 595 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 266 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Abarth | MCC |
Model | 595 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |