1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1306 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 595 | CTS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |