1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 1276 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 595. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2006 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 595 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 2770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 74 L |
