1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2008 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ranger weights approximately 962 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2008 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 595 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |