1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2008 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Camry weights approximately 890 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2008 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 595 | Camry |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1364 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |