1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 379 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M3 weights approximately 1411 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2010 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 595 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1803 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1392 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2761 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 63 L |
