1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2010 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2010 Seat Exeo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Seat Exeo (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Seat Exeo weights approximately 926 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2010 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Abarth | Seat |
Model | 595 | Exeo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2642 mm |