1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 996 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 595. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Abarth | Suzuki |
| Model | 595 | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 63 L |
