1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1274 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 595 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
