1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2012 Renault Latitude
To start off, 2012 Renault Latitude is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Latitude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 595 | 2012 Renault Latitude | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 595 | Latitude |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4897 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1832 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2760 mm |