1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 501 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Abarth | Suzuki |
| Model | 595 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |
