1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 513 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (35 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 595 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 695 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 548 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 474 kg | 1914 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
