1964 Abarth 595 vs. 2013 Dodge AVENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge AVENGER is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Dodge AVENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge AVENGER (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 595. (27 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge AVENGER should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge AVENGER weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1964 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 595 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 595. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge AVENGER, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge AVENGER (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth 595. (45 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge AVENGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth 595. 2013 Dodge AVENGER has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 595 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 595 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge AVENGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 595 | 2013 Dodge AVENGER | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 595 | AVENGER |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 593 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 97 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 4892 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 2064 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2765 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |
