1964 Abarth 700 vs. 1985 Chrysler Laser
To start off, 1985 Chrysler Laser is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chrysler Laser (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 700. (63 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 655 kg more than 1964 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chrysler Laser (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth 700. (69 Nm @ 5800 RPM). This means 1985 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth 700.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 700 | 1985 Chrysler Laser | |
Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
Model | 700 | Laser |
Year Released | 1964 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 696 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2470 mm |