1964 Abarth 700 vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 700. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 400 kg more than 1964 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Abarth 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth 700. (69 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth 700. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 700 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Abarth 700 2003 MCC Smart
Make Abarth MCC
Model 700 Smart
Year Released 1964 2003
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 696 cc 1124 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 63 HP 73 HP
Torque 69 Nm 100 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 570 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 3480 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1360 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1110 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 47 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]