1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1980 Pontiac Grand Prix

To start off, 1980 Pontiac Grand Prix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 4,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Pontiac Grand Prix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Pontiac Grand Prix weights approximately 904 kg more than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Abarth Mono 1000 1980 Pontiac Grand Prix
Make Abarth Pontiac
Model Mono 1000 Grand Prix
Year Released 1964 1980
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 982 cc 4954 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 59 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 560 kg 1464 kg
Vehicle Length 3490 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 69 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]