1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1996 Daewoo Nexia
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Nexia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Nexia (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Daewoo Nexia (138 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (91 Nm). This means 1996 Daewoo Nexia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1996 Daewoo Nexia | |
Make | Abarth | Daewoo |
Model | Mono 1000 | Nexia |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |