1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 982 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 (59 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 MCC Smart weights approximately 90 kg more than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Abarth | MCC |
| Model | Mono 1000 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
