1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 4,687 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 875 kg more than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (91 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | Mono 1000 | Durango |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 4687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 91 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2950 mm |